<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strong Password on Locodigital</title><link>https://locodigital.com.br/en/tags/strong-password/</link><description>Recent content in Strong Password on Locodigital</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 07:30:00 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://locodigital.com.br/en/tags/strong-password/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How to Create a Strong Password: 6-Word Passphrase (Diceware)</title><link>https://locodigital.com.br/en/technology/how-to-create-strong-password-passphrase-diceware/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 07:30:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://locodigital.com.br/en/technology/how-to-create-strong-password-passphrase-diceware/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;"Tr0ub4dor&amp;3" looks complicated, but it follows a pattern every password-cracking tool knows: a common word, letters swapped for numbers, a symbol at the end. Meanwhile "horse-battery-staple-cloud-pedal-sundae" looks like a joke and is far harder to guess. The difference lies in &lt;strong&gt;how the password was chosen&lt;/strong&gt;, not in how many symbols it has.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Why a password with symbols and numbers is not strong&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Humans are predictable when forced to meet complexity rules: capital first letter, "a" becomes "@", a number at the end, an "!" to close. People who crack passwords know this and try those variations first. The result is a password that is hard to remember and easy to guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>